Refocusing Funding on Learning Centered Policies, Programs, and Practices
Monday, June 26, 2001
Facilitator: Robert Barr
Recorder: Carole Lester
Resource: Robert McCabe
Session Purpose: To seriously engage the need for funding shifts in order to became a true Learning College
Proposed Session Outcome: Identify principles and strategies for reallocating resources especially funding to learning centered tasks, policies and functions.
· Introductions of participants
· Brainstorming work sessions
· Report back
· Concepts and Framework
· Funding framework:
new funds 1
· Key Questions:
1. How do you pay for new learning college tasks and functions without increases in funding?
2. How do you fund institutional structural changes (e.g., roles, rewards, systems)?
3. How do you work around the seat-time funding formula?
4. How would restructuring (new architecture) free funds for new learning college tasks?
5. Does becoming less labor intensive help?
6. How do you identify the things you can stop doing in order to do learning college things?
· Possible Principles Suggested From Key Questions
1. Identify learning outcomes
2. Design effective assessment strategies
3. Assess learning outcomes
4. Design and experiment with new learning experiences and environments
5. Redesign organizational structure and support alternative learning methods and pathways
6. Document the improvement of learning and institutional effectiveness
· $100 million budget
· 75% in salaries/benefits
· $1 million needed for defining and assessing outcomes
· Enrollment stable
· No new money
· Funded by seat time
· Eliminate unneeded program (athletics?)
· Community use of buildings to produce revenue to fund new learning college things
· Fewer meetings; more time to tend to things like teaching classes
· Cross-training groups to provide more comprehensive student services
· Change processes to be more inclusive (e.g., technology to deliver orientations)
· Bookstore partnered with publishers to create alternatives for text books
· Eliminate dying programs
· Criteria for release time assessment to show learning centered outcomes
· Try to effect change without having to have a crisis
· Value existing culture but shift the discussion and bridge from success to success
· Create impetus from boards and legislatures
· Freeze or delay hiring
· Uniform strategic department cuts in things like travel and hospitality
· Slow salary growth
· Review profit of profit centers; do they really produce?
· Consolidate laboratories (see collaboratotium)
· Rent space to community
· Change scheduling and registration process
· Low enrollment program review
· Space utilization
· Personnel utilization
· Core competencies
· Improve retention through process management; consolidate ownership of problem
· Core/shared measurements, vision, personal plans
· Empowerment teams-based environment
· Institutional vision starts from the general to the individual
· Create deeper stewardship with internal fund balances directed toward learning uses
· Search & Destroy program review
· Inelastic deliverables (e.g., facilities)
· Engineer out hidden costs (precision scheduling)
· Moving dollars to learning is not necessarily moving dollars to instruction
· New revenue (cost centers to revenue centers); outsourcing and partnerships (career center and job search company)
· Cross-functioning use of money in fund balances to impact learning positively
· Making learning initiatives a part of budgeting process
· Budget process based on designed principles for value added
· Field data from peer colleges on cost/ROI; need better data
· Need to talk more among colleges; share data and strategies
· Who does the marketing?
· How much does marketing cost?
· Do marketing efforts address recruiting or retention?
· Is it or should it be a centralized process?
· Who controls and who spends?