Resource Development Staff
Sunday,
June 24, 2001
Facilitator: Susan Kelley
Recorder: Bill Castellano
1. Of the major problems and issues discussed in the morning sessions, which are most important for us, as resource development staff, to address in this session?
·
How do we fund the vision? Not enough money
·
Reallocation of resources: alternate uses; splitting
salaries (e.g., between grants)
·
Rethink the architecture of the college: role of the
faculty; course/learning outcomes drive the classroom
·
Hiring, selection, marketing, and recruitment are very
expensive
·
Effective human resources support is expensive: How do we
fund it?
·
Staff and faculty training: Cost of providing support to
faculty and staff as they learn about learning-centered vision and practice
·
Tying grants to learning-centered objectives
2. What strategies can we share or create as Resource Development Staff for building a learning college culture in our institutions?
·
Grant development schedule, each related to institutional
learning goal
·
Endowed Chairs or Visiting Professors to promote learning
strategies
·
Improved communication relative to potential donors;
interaction with the institution among and between interested constituencies
within the college
·
Focus on impact on the student of dollars being sought
from donors
·
Donor Cultivation: work on strategic plans to move
business customers to donors
·
Help institution move from an abstract proposal to a
focused project; active partners in grant proposals
3. How are we doing as facilitators of learning in our roles as Resource Development Officers?
·
Teaching a course or in other ways interacting with
students, faculty, and staff
·
Facilitation of collaboration between interested parties
at the college; informal institutional communication clearinghouse
·
Grant writing class taught for faculty and staff; similar
class for students
4. How do our roles as Resource Development Officers need to change so we can better lead and contribute to our college’s journey to become more learning centered?
·
Involvement in collegewide planning and budget development
is critical to resource development
·
Visibility on campus and intentional interaction with
faculty and staff
·
Periodic celebration of resource development successes for
staff involved in any way with grants
·
All grants should be fed through one office
·
Resource development should clearly articulate
learning-centered philosophy with funding agencies
·
Treat funding agencies as real partners
Resource Development Staff
Monday,
June 25, 2001
Facilitator: Susan Kelley
Recorder: Bill Castellano
·
Creation of database of learning outcomes data of the 12
Vanguard Learning Colleges
·
Measurement of effectiveness and efficiency could be
studied; enable college to college comparison, perhaps through a grant
·
Are grants driving the college or is the college driving
the grants?
·
We have more opportunities to reallocate resources than to
find new money (e.g., eliminate programs and activities)
·
Partnerships can generate new money
·
Move away from FTE base; demand new measures
·
Foundation sponsored “endowed” advancement funds to
promote college, campus, department, and/or discipline initiatives
·
Collaborative process to help ensure buy-in to grants
focused on strategic plan
·
Encourage appropriate partnerships between and among other
neighboring colleges
·
Review grant guidelines from several funding agencies
·
Facilitation would be improved by developing a framework
to share grant submissions, peer reviews of grant proposals, a list of funded
grants, copies of grant resource/institutional advancement area job
descriptions, and organizational charts reflecting how grant
resource/institutional advancement functions fit within the institutional
governance structures.
·
Increased networking with resource development staff at
other colleges to share information and best practices
·
Co-author a CRD resource paper and Leadership Abstract
to address how the resource development area can help promote an institution’s
learning-centered effort.