Late Registration
Tuesday, June 26, 2001
Facilitator: Terry O’Banion
Recorder: Judy Clarke
Architecture:
·
The structure and or policies, which prevent learning from
happening
·
The group reviewed the two-paragraph component of the
article written by Terry O’Banion
·
If we want to create the ideal architecture, what would it
look like?
·
The group started off by listing the Value for students in
maintaining the “late registration process”
(two group brainstorming activity)
Student
Perspective
|
Educator
Perspective
|
|
1. Accommodates schedules |
1. Accurate placement |
|
2. Window of opportunity to attend |
2. Encourages good consumerism, educated choices |
|
3. Schedule didn’t list the instructor/now the student
knows who and where |
3. Select best instructor reflective of their preferred
learning style |
|
4. Time slot appeared for preferred class |
4. Accommodates student work schedules/changes in
personal schedules |
|
5. Easier to register not as crowded, doesn’t take as
long |
5. Happy students |
|
6. Way to get around the rules- less red-tape |
6. To accommodate student when initial courses is cancelled |
|
7. Student can change classes when they find out
content, teacher, personality or format of the class, not a fit |
7. Realistic impact of load |
|
8. Couldn’t register earlier because financial aid was
not awarded or didn’t have money |
8. Optimal opportunities “strike while the iron is hot” |
|
9. Don’t know child care solutions until late |
9. Able to accommodate students when they have had
problems enrolling at another institution |
|
10. Couldn’t get an advisor earlier, college is not
ready of the students |
|
|
11. College may cancel a class, need to get into another |
|
Groups were asked to list the top five values and to
restate if necessary
|
Student Perspective |
Educator perspective |
|
1. Student fit; right time, place, teacher |
|
2. Couldn’t register earlier because financial aid was
not awarded or money was not available |
2. Accommodating the student in lieu of institutional
barriers |
|
3.easier to register, not as crowded, less red tape,
more staff available |
3. Honor realistic assessment by student of what they
can do, circumstances change, what they realize based on first week |
|
4. Increase access opportunities |
4. Strike while the Iron is hot (student readiness
factor) |
The values that we want to preserve:
·
Want to provide students with an opportunity to maneuver
around what they have selected to accommodate personal needs
·
A great number of institutional barriers that we are
acknowledging need to be accommodated for
·
We are the access institutions
·
We value student success
Our priority is to create the best learning environment
for students. If we could change practice of late registration, what would it
look like? To get rid of late registration but to maintain our learning
centeredness.
Dialogue – brainstorming what this would look like (if
people could register any time)
·
Website- teacher profiles on the web, class profile,
syllabus, demonstrated teaching style, values, teaching style inventory
·
Learning style inventory
·
System of guaranteed classes (if listed, it will be
offered), faculty readiness
·
Student access sites to the information
·
Assessment and orientation and advising to be available
24/7 (online, print, group opportunities) mandatory assessment and placement
·
Various start times and many options
·
Modularize courses and provide variety in delivery
·
Accessible to all students
Teacher Profile (role play)
·
Picture/video of teacher making a statement/philosophy and
values, mini orientation and style
·
Video demonstration /snapshot of class
·
Testimonials from students/menu
·
Learning styles inventory tool
·
Teacher learning style, match
·
Class syllabus/practice quizzes, assignments
·
Self assessment tool