Tuesday, June 26, 2001
Facilitator: Bob Barr
Recorder: Amy Persell
Purpose
of this Session: Create
a new architectural form that continuously improves student learning.
Problem: If you could create,
with no restrictions, an entirely new architecture for designing and providing
learning environments and experiences, what would it look like?
Design
Process
· Purpose
· Principles
· People
· Processes
· Form/Structure
Purpose
of this institutional structure (subsystem): Design and provide,
conveniently, ever more powerful learning experiences and environments that
enable every student to learn specified outcomes. Organize learning
environments and experiences for student success.
Some
Possible Principles:
·
Every student can learn deeply and succeed greatly.
·
Learning requires the right feedback at the right time.
·
Get the maximum value from the talents and time of your
staff.
·
What works for learning is always an open question.
·
Learning environments need not involve traditional courses
or classrooms.
·
Staff collaboration is necessary for the best design
efforts.
·
Students learn at different rates at different times in
different subjects.
·
The subsystem must be designed such that it can be
responsible for the whole of its results.
·
The design should allow self-organization aligned with the
purpose.
·
Technology can be an important tool.
·
Design for organizational learning, not just problem
solving.
Organizational
Types: What is the difference?
· Problem Solving · Learning
-reactive -proactive
-in-the-box thinking -out-of-the-box
thinking
-linear -open,
circular, non-linear,
-single-loop
problem solving
dynamic
-double-loop
thinking
Organizational
Form/Structure: What
constitutes architecture?
· Org chart
· Reward system
· Communication channels
· Accountability
· Roles and
responsibilities
·
Processes/transactions
· Plus many more….
Peter Senge (one set of dimensions for
thinking about organization)
Vision
ß Structure
ß Processes
ß Action/Activities
· People
· Processes
· Organization
· Location
· Technology
· Data
· Communication
None of these concepts can be
dealt with in isolation. Many believe that you need to look at the larger whole
before being able to organize the institution. In order to understand the
organization you must first understand the processes that the organization is
to create.
·
Small, interdisciplinary and cross-community groups
interacting with a specific cluster of students. For example, a faculty member
would send a student to a specific financial aid officer and/or academic
advisor. This way a ‘bubble’ is created for the student to assist them with
every aspect of their learning. This would create a village around each student
with every member of the village committed to the student’s success. But a
challenge is how to create this experience for part-time students.
·
Organizing according to student learning outcomes.
·
Participation is expected and is universal (faculty and
staff).
·
Resources are allocated according to student learning
outcomes.
·
Regardless of the size of the institution, students need to
feel connected. Experiences need to be
personalized for each student.
·
The college needs to be organized according to the
students and communities needs, not according to our needs.

Values Mission
Technology Governance
Student
Learning
Services Outcomes

·
The unit does not own, but supports the employee.
·
Units are multi-dimensional, discipline is one dimension.
·
Units defined as need for learning.
·
Stages of students, especially the first term, are
reflected as a dimension.


ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê
Individualized Capstone Experience
MEASUREMENT

